Tuesday, October 25, 2011

Defensive refutations & Offensive responses

Defensive
Countering the truth: going off course from the truth
Pointing out the missing steps: bringing their thoughts to the open to try and understand
Explaining why the argument is not unique: telling the audience the reasons that something is same as always, not original
The argument is not comparative: there are not two sides
Raising empirical objects: messing around with the truth
Weighting arguments: seeing which argument has the most value
Logical fallacies: logically characterize an invalid argument
Causation/ cooritain fallacy: casual relationship between conduct and result using the random invalid arguments
Naturalistic fallacy: an invalid argument that uses words like ought to or should have not stating the facts
Begging the question: stating a position that needs to be proved as if it had already been proved
The false dilemma: a fake problem or not true situation
Offensive terms
Link term: failure to challenge two different meanings to make the audience be your side
Impact terms: challenge how it will be

No comments:

Post a Comment